BBC Interviewer: If
you are accustomed to eating maybe one or two servings [of rice] a week, it’s
not going to make that much difference?
Scientist: No, no
that’s absolutely the facts
This morning I listened to this interview with a
toxicologist about arsenic in rice. I don’t question scientific studies that
report that people seem unaffected by trace amounts of heavy metals in food, in the short term. However, I do question the above BBC interview where a
scientist claims it’s, “…absolutely the facts” that one or two servings of rice
a week is fine for human consumption, no matter where the rice comes from and no matter how long you are exposed to it. For
one thing, this scientist doesn’t address the issue of prolonged exposure to arsenic, found linked to bladder cancer in Taiwan. Most importantly, this scientist doesn’t support his claim with any evidence at all.
In the journal Nature, scientists recently reported that the
arsenic-laden rice in the news likely comes from rice crops cultivated on land
used in the past to grow cotton in the United States. In the past, U.S. cotton
fields were treated with arsenic-based chemicals to kill pests and to make
cotton harvest easier.
The current arsenic scare comes from a study on 200 samples of rice and rice products found in the U.S. Scientists from the FDA say this
sample is not big enough to recommend changes in people’s diet. So, these
scientists have advised the general public to wait on the results of a study
based on 1000 rice samples.
After reading the news and science blogs I asked myself a
few questions.
Do we need more evidence to find out exactly where
arsenic-contaminated rice is coming from and to clean those lands up?
I think so.
But, do we need more evidence to change our eating habits?
Most definitely not.
The interview I quote at the beginning of this blog scares
me. I’m envisioning a reoccurring scenario, when scientists from food
organizations say its okay to eat a little bit of heavy metals, just not too
much. Take tuna for example, many of these fish have methlymercury levels so high, pregnant woman are warned not to eat them at all. This tuna scare has
not been enough to stop many of us from eating tuna. Maybe we have limited the
amount of methylmercury-contaminated tuna and maybe will eat arsenic-enriched rice
in moderation, but, let’s use our common sense, when was even a little bit of these
heavy metals ever good for us?
If cotton-farmers 100 years ago knew the chemicals they put
on their crops would be absorbed by the rice their great-granddaughters would
be eating, would they still use it? I don’t have that answer. I can say that
farmers and consumers today should be well aware of how pesticides, and other
chemicals, persist in our ecosystem for generations. Today we are talking about
arsenic used a century ago. What will it be tomorrow? For one example, my guess
is that our descendants will slap their forehead when they think of all the glyphosate
we use today to remove weeds (really any other plant) from our soy, wheat, and cereal
crops.